Hoka’s Challenger and Speedgoat are two amazing series in running. Hoka itself is a household name when it comes to running shoes.
But while both these options are equally amazing, it’s simply difficult to choose either.
However, if you are aware of some subtle differences, you will be able to resolve the debate of Hoka Challenger vs Speedgoat for good.
Hoka Challenger ATR 7 Vs Speedgoat 5
Hoka Challenger ATR 7 is a sturdy one but, as its built with lightweight material, having your feet in it is a comfortable experience. This structure has made the ATR 7 a good option for man-made surfaces and moderate terrain. Speedgoat 5 on the other hand has more grip and performs its best off-train. Mud, snow, rock, or steep terrain are some ideal surfaces for Speedgoat.
Have a quick glance at the basic differences here,
|Hoka Challenger ATR 7||Hoka Speedgoat 5|
|Performance||Trails, hard pack, man-made surfaces, moderate terrain||Off-trail, mud, snow, rock scrambles or steep terrain|
|Durability||Less durable||More durable|
|Sole Unit||Dual-density midsole with a rubber outsole and 4mm lugs||Vibram Megagrip outsole with 5mm lugs|
|Upper Unit||Breathable mesh upper with a reinforced toe cap and heel counter||Water-resistant mesh upper with a reinforced toe cap and heel counter|
|Overall Opinion||Great for hiking and running on moderate terrain. More convenient for court games||Great for running on technical terrain.|
Let’s take a look at the differences in detail.
The sole unit of a shoe determines how it will perform on different surfaces.
The Hoka Challenger ATR 7 has a dual-density midsole along with a rubber outsole and 4mm lugs. The dual-density midsole facilitates active footwork and is essential for basketball, tennis, and other court sports. So, if you are planning to purchase shoes for the purpose of getting your body engaged in sports, get the Challenger ATR 7.
Similarly, the rubber outsole offers your feet the necessary traction. It protects your feet from outer surfaces, keeping your movement swift and unobstructed.
In contrast to the Challenger ATR 7, the Speedgoat 5 has a Vibram Megagrip outsole. It has 1mm more lugs compared to the ATR 7. The Vibram Megagrip is a popular option for its exceptional grip. This rubber compound can grip both dry and wet terrains with efficiency.
In a word, if you are planning on going for a trip to the mountains or any steep region, get Speedgoat 5. But if your purpose is sport, there are few competitors to Challenger ATR 7.
The upper unit determines the comfort of your feet.
Though it may sound unusual, the ideal type of upper unit greatly depends on the environmental condition you will be using your shoe. Here’s what I mean.
If you are in a space with low humidity and have a lot of sweating to do, a breathable mesh upper unit will be convenient. But, in case you are going to run around in a wet area or an area with high humidity, you are going to need a water-resistant mesh upper. This is the same for cold and rainy weather as well.
The Challenger ATR 7 has a breathable mesh upper unit with all its conveniences. This structure allows air to flow through more smoothly and keeps your feet active for longer. A reinforced toe cap and heel counter make the shoe more comfortable for larger feet.
The Speedgoat 5 has this convenient toe cap and heel counter as well. The only difference is that its upper unit is not breathable. The water-resistant mesh upper makes it kind of air-tight. This is perfect for hiking or running around in the snow. Such an air-tight upper unit, along with the sturdy grip, helps wearers climb mountains.
Well, neither of these options is at the top of the durability game. They have mid-range durability. As long as they are used for light running, either of these two shoes can be the only footwear you buy in the next 3 to 5 years.
But they do have their differences. The Hoka Speedgoat 5 is likely to last longer compared to Challenger ATR 7. The rugged construction and heavy weight of the Speedgoat 5 keep the essence of the shoe intact for years. It’s not only the build material but also the overall construction that makes the Speedgoat 5 a sturdy choice.
The Challenger ATR 7, on the other hand, is a lighter shoe. Though this lightness contributes to the swiftness of movement, it’s just not built for rough situations.
Don’t get me wrong. The Challenger ATR 7 is a perfectly well option for trailing and hiking. But if you are planning on setting out for longer trips, Speedgoat 5 has more to offer you.
As you can see, the Hoka Challenger ATR 7 is really a good choice for sports. If you play court games, Challenger ATR 7 is ready to offer you comfort and contribute convenience to your movements. Not only this, it is a good option for moderate hiking and jogging.
On the other hand, the Hoka Speedgoat 5 is perfect for running. You may not be able to climb Everest with it, but it surely provides enough grip to roam the entire Amazon. Speedgoat 5 is an ideal option for technical terrain for its sturdy grip and stable sole.
As the price of both these options is almost identical, there’s actually nothing much to be confused about. You are probably realizing at this moment that all the real difference lies in the purpose.
Want to go hiking? Get Speedgoat 5.
Into sports and court games? Challenger ATR 7 is the ideal option for you.