Hoka Mach 4 vs Rincon 3

The Hoka Mach 4 and Rincon 3 are two of the latest shoes from Hoka. They both appear similar but there are some differences between them. 

The Mach 4 is a smooth ride but can feel firm after 200 miles, while the Rincon 3 has nice cushioning and responsiveness without being too mushy. Some users prefer the Mach 4 for long runs and marathons, while others find Rincon 3 better for tempo and faster runs.

Additionally, considering the price is also important as well as checking whether or not the shoe has any special features.

Therefore, when comparing Hoka Mach 4 and Rincon 3, you must also take these aspects into account.

Throughout this article, we will compare the Hoka Mach 4 and Rincon 3. So, let’s dive right into the article and see what differences they’ve got.

Quick specs comparison

Before starting a detailed comparison between the Hoka Mach 4 and Hoka Rincon 3, let us take a quick look at the specifications and features of both shoes.

Here are the specs:

                  Mach 4                  Rincon 3
Weight               8.60 oz (243g)              7.70 oz(218g)
Heel-To-Toe Drop                  5.00 mm                   5.00 mm 
Volume                642.00 cm3              603.00 cm3
Spring Measurement                  39×25 mm                38×24 mm
Stability                    Neutral                  Neutral
Cushion                Responsive                  Balanced

Hoka Mach 4

We’ll start with Hoka’s latest Mach 4, which has recently gained popularity.

With its well-cushioned and lightweight design, the Hoka Mach 4 is ideal for daily training and racing. It’s kind of a do-it-all shoe, so you can wear it for multiple purposes.

The Mach 4 is quite comfortable due to its thick midsole. So, as long as it’s comfortable enough for daily runs, I don’t think you’ll have a problem.

Also, it has a wider base, which makes it more stable for runners with wide feet.

In Mach 4, there is no outsole rubber which provides a more natural feeling on the ground. However, this also causes problems with durability.

Pros and cons: Hoka Mach 4

Let’s discuss the good and bad sides of Hoka Mach 4:

Pros Cons
well-cushioned slightly heavier
  lightweight designno outsole rubber
more ground feel expensive
wider base for stabilitycompromised durability

Hoka Rincon 3

Let’s talk about another popular running shoe from Hoka. Rincon 3 is a lightweight running shoe, suitable for daily training, uptempo sessions, and recovery walks. 

The Hoka Rincon 3 is made up of a compression-molded EVA foam midsole that makes the shoe lighter and less spongy than other Hoka models like the Clifton 8, which is from the award-winning series of Hoka.

Also, the Rincon 3 has a durable outsole with a moderate amount of rubber that maintains its reputation as a flexible shoe.

When you want to run fast, the protective cushion will provide comfort while maintaining a responsive toe-off.

The shoe’s upper is made of the latest engineered mesh that makes the appearance more premium than previous versions of the Rincon.

Pros and cons: Hoka Rincon 3

Like several other shoes in the market, the Rincon 3 also has some cons along with its many advantages. 

Let’s see what advantages and drawbacks it has got:

                              Pros                              Cons
lightweight and versatilenot much stable and supportive
compression-molded EVA foam midsolemay cause discomfort or pain
breathable single-layer mesh upper compromised design
durable outsolelow mileage 

Overall Comparison

The comparison between Mach 4 and Rincon 3 is like comparing an SUV with a racing car because they both may be running shoes but they are engineered differently.

The Hoka Mach 4 focuses primarily on comfort and stability, while the Rincon 3 focuses more on weight and durability.

But despite this fact, they’ve got similarities in many ways.

After researching both shoes and comparing them, our team decided who is the winner.

Runners usually require a stable and comfortable shoe because while running, balance is important as well as comfort.

Since both are running shoes, providing the right balance, stability, comfort, and support should be their only focus.

Hoka Mach 4 kept that in mind to provide runners with the best performance. Meanwhile, Rincon 3 is lightweight but it lacks in terms of comfort and support.

Another problem with Rincon 3 is its low-profile design with simple colors that may look cheap to some people.

So, I personally think Mach 4 is the winner here as it can fulfill the requirements of runners. But when comparing the weight and price Rincon 3 jumps Mach 4.

Here is a graph with scores based on Hoka Mach 4 and Rincon 3 users’ personal reviews, so that you can understand simply and decide which one is good for you.

I hope at this point you’ve got a clear understanding of the differences between Hoka’s Mach 4 and Rincon 3.

Now it’s up to you to decide which one of those to choose. You can either go with Mach 4 or Rincon 4. It depends completely on your preferences.

It is more practical to choose the Rincon 3 over the Mach 4 if you are looking for a lightweight yet durable shoe.

However, if you’re looking for a supportive and comfortable shoe, the Mach 4 would be the ideal choice.


The Mach 4 and Rincon 3 are both excellent choices since they offer lightweight, comfortable, and supportive shoes for a fun ride. They both offer the same features but are slightly different.

The Mach 4 is an ideal running shoe that offers everything a runner could ask for, although the Rincon 3 may lack some key features.

In terms of design, the Rincon 3 has a sleek and streamlined design, while the Mach 4 has a more dynamic and bold design. The Mach 4 is more responsive, while the Rincon 3 is lighter.

Ultimately, the choice between the two shoes depends on personal preference and the type of running experience one is looking for.

So, consider your needs before choosing the right shoe for you, because you will be the one to benefit in the end.

Share Your Love!